Which type of contract is typically associated with dominant party influence?

A contract of adhesion is typically characterized by a significant imbalance of power between the parties involved, where one party has a dominant influence over the terms of the agreement. This type of contract is often crafted by a party with greater bargaining power, such as a large corporation or a service provider, and presented to the weaker party on a "take it or leave it" basis. Consequently, the party with less leverage often has little room to negotiate the terms and must either accept the contract as it is or forgo the transaction altogether.

In many situations, contracts of adhesion are found in consumer agreements, insurance policies, and service contracts, where the consumer might not have the ability to negotiate the standard terms set forth by the provider. This dynamic further solidifies the understanding that these contracts are heavily influenced by the dominant party, making it crucial for individuals to read and comprehend the terms fully before agreeing.

In contrast to this, the other types of contracts mentioned do not inherently embody this imbalance. A unilateral contract involves a promise in exchange for a performance, a conditional contract has stipulations that must be met for the contract to be valid, and a valued contract specifies predetermined values for the parties’ obligations. Each of these forms of contracts operates under different principles that do